Dillon and Cooper at Central Ohio Dachshund Club Specialty |
Dillon has proved to be a very good student that listens to instructions and puts them in practice. He can be very hard on himself if he makes a mistake. We keep reminding him we aren't saving lives, it's a dog show, but he is the type of person that has a strong work ethic and maintains a high personal standard. With that combination I know he will be very successful in all his endeavors.
When he went back in for Best of Variety, he entered with well known professional handlers, very successful long-time breeder/owner/handlers. I know he was nervous but it didn't show too much. When he was pointed at the the judge said, "You young man are Best of Winners" I was just bursting for him. When he immediately looked at me with that huge smile, I could have bawled with sheer delight.
He wasn't as successful at the second specialty Saturday or the All Breed on Sunday. That is as life. You win some and you lose some. That is another great lesson for all of us, not just a Junior. He can come out of the ring and tell you what he did well and what he could have done better. It's important that he learns that if he was guaranteed to win each time out, that soon no one else would show up to compete. He also must be a graceful winner and loser.
Dillon is a great kid! If you have thought about sponsoring a Junior, what are you waiting on? It's so rewarding for you and the Junior. You are missing out on those moments like we are having. Every time Dillon successfully learns another skill or when he giggles with delight when playing with his dog or when he has a successful showing, that gives me indescribable joy.
My Perfect World
In my perfect world, the road to a dog show would be short, the
judges would love each dog I presented to them, and my wins would be constant.
Each breed has a standard and each judge who adjudicates upon a class of dogs
can interpret that standard to his/her own desired specifications. But how then
can interpretation vary to such a marked degree in so many cases. To interpret
is 'to give one's impression ' as defined in the dictionary. Therefore I
suppose it follows that when a judge is allotting wins in a class of dogs, the decisions made are based on the
standard as it has been studied and as it has been compared to the animals
standing before him. What of the dog that is considered too large. Not a disqualifying fault according to the
standard, but there exists in this
written credo a variation of, let us say,
2 inches lowest to highest and dog A is closer
to the higher range in height. His other attributes adhere to the standard in
terms of bone mass, colour, head properties and functional movement. How then
does the baby get thrown out with the bath water because a judge proclaims that
he is 'too large for me'. Perhaps this is the area of interpretation that requires
some adjustment. If the written standard allows for height variations and
providing these have not been exceeded, how then can an animal be too large.
Faulting an otherwise worthy dog for personal height preference or any other partiality
for that matter that does not apply to the written standard is unsuitable
judging. For arguments sake, let us consider colour. A breed is recognized in three allowable colours: black,
white and purple. with no one
colour being preferred over the other.
The best dog in the ring is a black one but the judge on the day has freely
admitted that he prefers this breed in purple. And so he awards the lesser
purple dog. But how can that be when the written rules for the breed make no
allowance for placing one colour preferential to the other. Personal choice cannot
supersede a judges' obligation to bestow
honours on the dog most deserving, providing all aspects of the standard are met
in terms of size, form, shape, and
function.
If the standard is the blueprint for the
breed , then a judge can be considered the building consultant, who must adhere
to the written word as it describes each breed of dog. This is a daunting task
when one considers that we have in excess of 140 CKC recognized breeds with
more on the horizon awaiting approval. The memory required to recall height,
weight, colour, and structure in a given breed is monumental. Many exhibitors are dismayed when observing a judge referencing the breed standard for
information on a given trait. Why?? Does
this not indicate a desire to be properly enlightened and confident of one's choices
before making the ultimate decision. There is no shame in admitting that the complexities
and various subtleties of a breed can be easily overlooked when only mere
minutes are possible to assess each entrant. Perhaps all breed judging status
is beyond the scope of us mere mortals. And
while certain degrees of judging aptitude are applicable to many breeds, it is the smaller distinctions that set each
breed apart, making them unique and
singular in their appeal. Exhibitors
must shoulder a portion of the responsibility that encourages a judges' ability to adhere to the standards. For
example, when chows lack a stilted gait,
bulldogs do not roll, and afghans
are not elastic in their stride, how
then can one expect a judge to recognize a superior specimen if one does not exist in his/her ring. If we are
to request that judges scrutinize our breeds and reach conclusions about their
worthiness as required by the standard , then we as exhibitors are compelled to
provide dogs of merit. To succumb to fads and fashions that are currently the
winning craze is to lose sight of the original purpose and destiny of the
breeds The future of the dog is in our hands and in my perfect world, each dog is a carbon copy of the standard
with perfection and excellence being the paramount qualities that demand
attention and deserve recognition.
Pam welcome your comments, thoughts and ideas. Please share with her at: pamm@niagara.com or find her on Facebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment